The case for reducing Elementals

This is a doc I’ve been sitting on for a while, and now would be as good a time as any to share :slight_smile:

Disclaimer #1: This is strictly a personal concern I’ve had for a while; it’s not indicative of the views of anyone else on the team but me, nor is it indicative of the future of the class.

Disclaimer #2: This is an idea I’ve entertained manifold, in many forms. It is by no means my belief that this is the only way the class should/could go; I’m only entertaining an idea that I find to have some merit, and would like to hear the players’ views on.

The Elementals tab has always been wildly popular, so it should be no surprise that the majority of the current feedback on the class revolves around it, no less than how Flagship (arguably) treated it in the TC. The tab came, and comes, with the practical advantage of providing damage, but also comes with inherent disadvantages that I believe Flagship intended to address through power reduction and Dark Lord. Thus, I’ll try to consolidate these factors and argue for a radical, albeit already introduced by Flagship (in the case of Spectral Elemental) solution; reducing Elementals.

  1. What Elementals offer.

Elementals are semi-specialized sources of dealing damage, while also serving as meatshields. Pre-TC, they were the sole way a Summoner could attain more damage than the practical cap of a maxed Warper, since the player themselves rarely interacted with or damaged enemies, and they lacked a direct damage-increasing means/stat (ie ACC/STR).

Excluding the Force and Spectral ones (the former being strictly meatshields and the latter already being 1), the other 3 are diversified by their intended role. Fires can ignite, Storms can reliably kill flying enemies, and Toxics produce a field on hit that can poison and synergizes with Brom’s Curse.

Lastly, the Elementals offer the center for Elemental Nova; the only AoE spell the class possesses, Nova is centered on all Elementals present and produces a field based on their elemental strengths.

  1. What Elementals lack, and how T3 and Flagship addressed them.

By nature, sheer dependency on Elementals creates an array of factors that hamper the functionality of the class.

a) Gear dependency. By design, the class objectively has more desired properties. There are 3 +minion stat properties, at least 2 beneficial +stat properties (STA/WILL for feeds alone or ACC/STA/WILL for DF), and complementary properties such as +power and +shields. Equalizing all other factors, a Summoner’s armor requires much more finetuning to start paying off than an Evoker’s does. Put another way, the effort/performance curve is much steeper in this scenario.

b) AI dependency. While it could be argued that this is the concept of minion-based classes, Hellgate’s frame renders this dysfunctional. Massive numbers cause the AI to divide DPS among undesirable targets, while the nature of their attacks often causes them to miss entirely. Lastly, the AI can simply choose to not engage with enemies, both limiting the maximum engagement range and imposing a unique disadvantage on the class that is arguably not compensated for through any means.

c) Role inadequacy. Elementals lack a distinct role beyond a basic differentiation and, by extension, so does the class. Higher numbers of any Elemental only add DPS, with the added power cost only offering more critters on the field.

d) AoE/debuff vulnerability. Lastly, large numbers of said critters create a uniquely disadvantaging situation, where a single AoE or such Auras as the Tormenters’ one can drastically reduce DPS, to the point where the current CDs cannot match the rate in which they’re destroyed. Moreover, a sole Ignite applied to one Elemental travels more easily within a larger group, decimating the group in a short time.

Apart from purely performance-related concerns, Flagship allegedly had issues with large numbers of Elementals due to them causing lag for parties. They addressed the issue by enforcing small numbers of Elementals (Feral gear power reduction, small minion stats, high minion power costs and CDs), while introducing both a direct means of dealing damage (DF, thus relocating the “cap” elsewhere) and minions that are dependent on the player’s actions but not tied to the power pool (Dark Minions), while being capped at 3 in number.

T3 remedied the issues of Elementals in a different manner. Higher base and bonus stats, 1’’ CD, and Mass Summon, all guaranteed that Elementals would survive more. Their decision to then enforce a global minion damage cap seems to have been based on their business model (Nanoforge creating revenue) rather than game balance concerns, so I believe it is of secondary importance.

  1. What the game offers conceptually as alternative approaches, and what they may achieve.

Apart from T3’s simpler approach of simply buffing the Elementals to desirable levels, I’d argue that the game itself offers alternative approaches that may be worth considering. Such approaches (or a hybrid between them and T3’s, ie buffing) may be more suited to 2038 than purely T3’s approach, which was framed by entirely different encounters, factors, and numbers.

a) Limiting each Elemental type to 1, possibly apart from Forces.

This is the concept used for the Spectral Elemental. Limited to 1 in number, more points in the skill provide a buff to the base Elemental. Forces are excluded from this suggestion for the sole reason that their role is mandatory in most endgame encounters, and decreasing their total numbers would require more/different means of compensation compared to strict damage dealers.

b) Sfx multipliers and added projectiles.

The former being drawn from most Evoker skills and the latter from Rocket Bot, both are concepts that already exist in the game and can provide inspiration.

In terms of class performance, limiting each Elemental to 1 would reduce total DPS (unless their base damage values are increased manifold), but it would also free up a considerable amount of WILL (excluding feeds) that can then be invested in ACC/STR or STA to boost DPS or survivability. Moreover, fewer total Elementals would partly alleviate the practical issues of them dying en masse and “contacting” Ignite, as well as potential party lag.

In terms of build diversity and class role, providing sfx multipliers and possibly added projectiles would arguably allow the class to follow the concept of Evokers; specialization in an element provides the option of reliable sfx of choice. This could allow the class to specialize against such bosses as Dessy in a comparable way to the Evokers’ Swarm sfx multipliers, fitting better into a “debuffer” role. Added projectiles would allow each Elemental to deal damage both in a wider range (ie if Fire eventually scales up to Flameshards) and more reliably (as one projectile often misses against moving targets, while many shouldn’t).

Lastly, adding sfx bonuses and reducing the total numbers would allow Elemental Nova to apply sfx more reliably, and Master of the Elements would be freed to be modified into any desirable passive boost of choice (since a reduced power cost would practically be needless).

Minor tweaks would certainly still need to be made in other areas to frame such a suggestion properly, but the TC’s evolving state has arguably already left behind the need for such tweaks. Regardless, I feel such an idea may very well have been among Flagship’s future plans, given their direction outlined above, and it may be quite productive to entertain it.

1 Like

Wouldnt play the class if i can only summon 1 of each (And its my main)
Gearing the class so i can summon more is most of the fun.
One of the best summoner in games because of the litle army and the work/gearing to do it.
Reducing 10 to 6-5 is ok. but not 10 to 1.

Even if i rarely play this class, i might have some ideas for elementals.

I like the zerg style of having plenty of them but i can understand the concerns this brings.

Limiting to one feels harsh and could prevent building zerg type summoners which i know a lot of people like. What about this as a compromised:
Each elemental after the first one(or two) of each categories requires more and more power to be casted. Like the 1st fire would cost 5, the next one 10, then 25 and so on(numbers obviously pulled out of nowhere). By doing this, one could still choose the zerg style but has the be ready to invest for it.
I really like the idea of buffing sfx while reducing the number or minions, and i feel it could go well with mine. Imagine the situation where the next fire elemental would cost like 200 power, but would allow them to reach a threshold where they all gain more projectiles :). Or the next toxic would then reach a bigger aoe with their field. Or once you reach higher threshold, they could get summoned all once to reward you for the investment.
It would give incentive to reach the next threshold while at the same time preventing people to cast ALL of them just to help the bad AI thinking that if I have more of them, maybe some of my elementals will do stuff while others are touching themselves in a corner for some reasons.

I feel we could have some more diversity maybe if one chooses to focus on fire ones for exemple for giant coverage and general clearspeed, while having burst damage setup for bosses/elites with a temporary big Reaper dude.

Just a quick thought i had while not being a pro summo by any means ^^

Oh and yeah, a mass summon skill is a must imo :stuck_out_tongue:

Being an old doc, I now realize this does lack some refinements and ideas that have since been proposed; ones that might address some such concerns.
One idea that would fit such a concept (again, none of those are planned or agreed on - even in theory) would be “Masteries”; specializations that each class would take to elevate it to a specific playstyle, while also limiting it away from being able to be overboard or an absolute all-rounder. So such an approach might very well have Elementals start this way, and then the player gets the option of specializing in Elementals and becomes able to pull off army builds.

Of course, an alternative approach would be the opposite; start with Elementals being as they are, then have the “Elementalist” in question be able to consolidate Elementals down to 1 each, practically increasing their power and reducing their weaknesses that come with numbers.

Again, all just rough ideas that have been brought up over time. The idea of having specializations that transform skills and mandate playstyles is an old one as well, but it is one that could fit such hypothetical scenarios quite well.

1 Like

I personally feel that 41 minions is a TAD too much, and I wouldn’t be a fan of chopping it down to JUST one of each either.

To keep the same amount of skill points on the tree for Elementals (60 points (10 for each elemental and 10 for JUST the fire elemental)), you could do 5 points in each elemental for 25 total elementals, then each elemental can scale like the fire elemental with a 7 point node to increase either the damage the elemental does, or the strength of the ailments they do. So each elemental can cap at 5, and have 7 points in increasing its stats since you are halving your minion pool (effective damage) here.

If you don’t want to add other nodes, then just make it so that each Elemental has 1 node on the skill tree for it that caps at 10, and for every 2 points in that node, you get an extra elemental of that type. That node will also scale damage or elemental ailment strength as well, so it buffs each since you are halving your effective minion pool this way as well.

Since both methods choose to go with 5 of each (25 minions) instead of 10 of each and one Spectral (41 minions), you could make each minion cost roughly 16 reserved power instead of 10, giving you abouty the same reserved to work your gear around to AT LEAST make gearing for 25 minions a task. I didn’t find gearing for 41 that bad, allthough I got lucky and got alot of Scathing gear with Willpower and Power Points on it.

Anything to cut down on the lag that Elemental Nova with 41 elementals cause. I usually don’t run with a full 41 when farming and such, only when progressing…

2 Likes

I told a friend of mine of the Summoner update and asked him how he sees the reduction of elementals ( i never played summoner).
Clear answer was: No way!.

He has a pretty top notch Summoner with i think around 25 eles pre patch. When he tried the patch he was able to easily bring out all eles. And then stuff started to lag a bit in the Catas. So even he thought it might be a bit too much. I am also not sure if this doesnt lead to summoners not being wanted in groups, which would be a shame since they now can at least follow the group without losing their minions.
Overall he was happy about the update even though it all seemed a bit op.